[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: version tracking plans?

On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 07:57:52PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> I'd like to leave a limited form of reopen around (versionless, doesn't
> let you change submitter) for a while at least because I'm a wimp. :-)

(I'm inclined to think having a limited reopen would be more confusing than
doing away with it entirely)

> > This command definitely doesn't let you change the submitter. (Maybe
> > when/if the .status format ever changes this could happen)
> The syntax would be a headache ('open <bug#> [<submitter>] [<version>]',
> so how would you tell the optional bits apart?), so I think it's better
> to leave that out.

Sorry. I meant that if you say:

	open 123456 1.0-1

then your email address (from From:/Reply-To:) would be stored as a submitter
for that version. Might be a stupid idea, but it's completely impossible now,
so whatever.


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

       ``Is this some kind of psych test?
                      Am I getting paid for this?''

Attachment: pgpXPadIvsZ3L.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: