On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 22:24 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 14519 March 1977, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > The first is acceptable, the latter is not, for hopefully obvious > > > reasons. > > > > I meant the latter. Your reason for objecting is not obvious to > > me. I > > understand that this can't be done for the main archive and all its > > mirrors, which is fine - this is only important for emabrgoed > > security > > updates. > > We offer the archives, including security, by rsync too. > And that should stay. Mirrors of security do exist, for good > reasons.[1] > > Why does it need to be in the archive? [...] I don't know of any other way of getting files back out of dak. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings If at first you don't succeed, you're doing about average.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part