Re: Archive database (projectb) queries for the public
On 13397 March 1977, Ian Jackson wrote:
Part I is all nice and stuff, just needs an implementation.
> We should use a dedicated CA to sign the server's TLS key.
Now this - why? What speaks against using any CA, be it the SPI one (or
one of its subs, like the Debian CA?) as DSA use it elsewhere - or even
one of the mafia sh*t around?
> Using a dedicated CA avoids relying on the public X.509 infrastructure
> which is both inconvenient and insecure.
That rules out the mafia, but not the Debian (Sub) CA.
Thats about the major "WTF?" I have with this, all the rest sounds good.
--
bye, Joerg
[ New Maintainer Prozess ]
<panthera> ein jahr ist ein bisschen zu optimistisch,
<_rene_> panthera: kommt auf den NM/AM an.
/* _rene_ ist pantheras AM und lässt sich mit pantheras
package check schon ein wenig Zeit ;) */
Reply to: