[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[dak/master] unchecked



run the process-policy stuff and accept (late) builds for already accepted
security releases.
this also requires a run of the normal archive fun, to push it out.

Signed-off-by: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
---
 config/debian-security/cron.unchecked |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/config/debian-security/cron.unchecked b/config/debian-security/cron.unchecked
index ea8f505..89baf28 100755
--- a/config/debian-security/cron.unchecked
+++ b/config/debian-security/cron.unchecked
@@ -15,10 +15,19 @@ reportdis=$queuedir/REPORT.disembargo
 timestamp=$(date "+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M")
 doanything=false
 
+# So first we should go and see if any process-policy action is done
+dak process-policy embargo | mail -a "X-Debian: DAK" -e -s "Automatically accepted from embargoed" team@security.debian.org -- -F "Debian FTP Masters" -f ftonaster@ftp-master.debian.org
+dak process-policy disembargo | mail -a "X-Debian: DAK" -e -s "Automatically accepted from unembargoed" team@security.debian.org -- -F "Debian FTP Masters" -f ftonaster@ftp-master.debian.org
+
+# Now, if this really did anything, we can then sync it over. Files
+# in newstage mean they are (late) accepts of security stuff, need
+# to sync to ftp-master
+
 cd $newstage
 changes=$(find . -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 -type f -name \*.changes | sed -e "s,./,," | xargs)
 if [ -n "$changes" ]; then
     echo "$timestamp": ${changes:-"Nothing to do in newstage"}  >> $report
+    rsync -a -q $newstage/. /srv/queued/ftpmaster/.
     dak process-upload -a -d "$newstage" >> $report
 fi
 
@@ -44,4 +53,13 @@ if ! $doanything; then
   exit 0
 fi
 
+dak dominate
+dak generate-filelist
+cd $configdir
+$configdir/map.sh
+apt-ftparchive generate apt.conf
+dak generate-releases
+/srv/security-master.debian.org/dak/config/debian-security/make-mirror.sh
+sudo -u archvsync -H /home/archvsync/signal_security
+
 $masterdir/cron.buildd
-- 
1.5.6.5



Reply to: