[dak/master] embargo/disembargo build up a symlink farm for our buildds.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
---
daklib/queue_install.py | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/daklib/queue_install.py b/daklib/queue_install.py
index 80787b5..d538878 100755
--- a/daklib/queue_install.py
+++ b/daklib/queue_install.py
@@ -115,9 +115,15 @@ def is_unembargo(u):
return ret
def do_unembargo(u, summary, short_summary, chg, session=None):
- return package_to_queue(u, summary, short_summary,
- get_policy_queue('disembargo'), chg, session,
- announce=None)
+ polq=get_policy_queue('disembargo')
+ package_to_queue(u, summary, short_summary,
+ polq, chg, session,
+ announce=None)
+ for suite_name in u.pkg.changes["distribution"].keys():
+ suite = get_suite(suite_name, session)
+ for q in suite.copy_queues:
+ for f in u.pkg.files.keys():
+ os.symlink(os.path.join(polq.path, f), os.path.join(q.path, f))
#
#################################################################################
#
@@ -128,9 +134,15 @@ def is_embargo(u):
return True
def do_embargo(u, summary, short_summary, chg, session=None):
- return package_to_queue(u, summary, short_summary,
- get_policy_queue('embargo'), chg, session,
- announce=None)
+ polq=get_policy_queue('embargo')
+ package_to_queue(u, summary, short_summary,
+ polq, chg, session,
+ announce=None)
+ for suite_name in u.pkg.changes["distribution"].keys():
+ suite = get_suite(suite_name, session)
+ for q in suite.copy_queues:
+ for f in u.pkg.files.keys():
+ os.symlink(os.path.join(polq.path, f), os.path.join(q.path, f))
################################################################################
@@ -253,6 +265,7 @@ def acknowledge_new(u, summary, short_summary, chg, session):
# FIXME: queues should be able to get autobuild
# the current logic doesnt allow this, as buildd stuff is AFTER accept...
+# embargo/disembargo use a workaround due to this
# q-unapproved hax0ring
QueueInfo = {
"new": { "is": is_new, "process": acknowledge_new },
--
1.5.6.5
Reply to: