[newdak/master] Dependencies, old code
Want to check depends much earlier.
Also mention old code.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
---
feature.txt | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/feature.txt b/feature.txt
index 5820c91..46e9e93 100644
--- a/feature.txt
+++ b/feature.txt
@@ -19,6 +19,9 @@ When we are done with one, mark it X and add the done date too.
If you work on something and it takes longer - mark it.
+Hint: Don't write down features which are in current dak. Only new
+ones. Unless they should be changed in some way.
+
Also, do look into old dak doc/TODO, it does have some nice hints what
to avoid/do.
@@ -215,7 +218,7 @@ General Archive Issues
# From here on I just write down features in a "per tool" based
# sectioning. Of course this is based on the old dak and the tools we
-# had there. It doesn't neccessarily mean that has to end up in the same
+# have there. It doesn't neccessarily mean that has to end up in the same
# way in newdak. But it helps for writing here.
# [Ganneff]
@@ -235,3 +238,15 @@ process-new
process-unchecked, process-accepted
-----------------------------------
[See above for NiV2 as a general issue touching these]
+
+ + Check Dependencies. [Ganneff] Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:54:34 +0200
+ At upload time, when we first process the package, another check
+ should run that verifies that Depends:, Recommends: and
+ Build-Depends[-Indep] to be valid and existant (including version
+ constraints). Obviously less strict for contrib and non-free.
+
+ Should reject on missing / not full-fillable ones and warn on useless
+ version constraints (meaning we have a version which is in stable, no
+ need to declare it).
+
+
--
1.5.6.3
Reply to: