[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Name poll (Was: New name: Call for opinions)


On Tuesday 23 September 2008 21:38, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Consensus doesnt mean everybody agrees. At least, rough consensus doesnt
> > mean that :-)
> OK, so I hope doodle is a good tool to reach this.  I started a poll at
>      http://doodle.ch/ggey86bvqnmcnuyb

Cool, thank you!

What I also really like is that you labeled it a "poll" and didn't set a 
timeline ;-) ,
(To clarify myself a bit about this: I also think this issue is important and 
should be resolved rather soon, I just don't think a static timeline helps if 
followed blindly :-)

And to answer/address Jonas' comment on the poll: _if_ we vote, I'm all for 
using Condorcet method - if we vote. I really prefer consensus :-)

(but/and I also think the secretary of this vote should decide :)

> The name is targeted at "thingy 1" of the CDDNamingProposals - the
> poll just leaves room for 512 characters so there was no chance to
> copy the full text of the thingy 1 specification and I used the
> explanation which was used for CDD on [2].

Maybe that info can be added there as well. (That its thingy1 only. I'd 
suggest "The new term should only include CDDs which are 100% debian.")


Attachment: pgpGIg9gINbC2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: