Hi, On Tuesday 23 September 2008 21:38, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Consensus doesnt mean everybody agrees. At least, rough consensus doesnt > > mean that :-) > > OK, so I hope doodle is a good tool to reach this. I started a poll at > > http://doodle.ch/ggey86bvqnmcnuyb Cool, thank you! What I also really like is that you labeled it a "poll" and didn't set a timeline ;-) , (To clarify myself a bit about this: I also think this issue is important and should be resolved rather soon, I just don't think a static timeline helps if followed blindly :-) And to answer/address Jonas' comment on the poll: _if_ we vote, I'm all for using Condorcet method - if we vote. I really prefer consensus :-) (but/and I also think the secretary of this vote should decide :) > The name is targeted at "thingy 1" of the CDDNamingProposals - the > poll just leaves room for 512 characters so there was no chance to > copy the full text of the thingy 1 specification and I used the > explanation which was used for CDD on [2]. Maybe that info can be added there as well. (That its thingy1 only. I'd suggest "The new term should only include CDDs which are 100% debian.") regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgpGIg9gINbC2.pgp
Description: PGP signature