Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)

To: debian-edu@lists.debian.org
Cc: Custom Debian Distributions <debian-custom@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)
From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 13:56:38 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.1.00.0803031355550.20430@wr-linux02>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200803031123.02349.debian@layer-acht.org>
References: <20080226175431.GA10289@roeckx.be> <200803021322.30006.holger@layer-acht.org> <[🔎] alpine.DEB.1.00.0803030940460.26687@wr-linux02> <[🔎] 200803031123.02349.debian@layer-acht.org>

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Holger Levsen wrote:

On Monday 03 March 2008 09:51, Andreas Tille wrote:

use Arch:any.

... based on packages that are available in i386?


No. Based on the list of packages which are available for each arch.


At the cost of leaving the RC bug open for at least three weeks?

Kind regards

      Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de

Reply to:

References:
- Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)
  - From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
- Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)
  - From: Holger Levsen <debian@layer-acht.org>