Re: Feedback about the cdd-dev package and more...
|--==> Sergio Talens-Oliag writes:
ST> [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)>]
ST> El Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 08:52:26AM +0100, Andreas Tille va escriure:
>>On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>
>>>> more than once on this list). The current cdd-dev package only supports
>>>> metapackages.
>>>NOOOOO.
>>>The packages in "sarge/sid" only support meta packages but you are not
>>>supposed to use thesie because I just do not want to make untested software
>>>its way into Sarge.
>>Uhm, sorry, Sergio was right. I just noticed that I did not yet uploaded
>>cdd-dev 0.3.10 (from SVN) which supports tasksel. This version has still
>>some problems, but if you are looking for tasksel support - just give
>>the SVN version a try (and fix the remaining problems).
>>(If the SVN mail interface would have worked you all would have noticed this
>>enhancement ... :-( )
ST> Well, I was working with the unstable packages installed on my system but
ST> looking at the svn source for some things, so I was not doing it the right
ST> way anyway.
ST> I'll build the svn packages and work with them for everything, and if I
ST> modify anything I'll put it on the svn repository.
ST> One question... are you tagging the packages? I'm using the svn-builpackage
ST> tool for my own packages and I believe it is quite useful, give it a try and
ST> if everybody agrees we could store the cdd-dev package in a compatible
ST> format, just to be able to branch and merge in a common way (I would like to
ST> work on a branch to implement new features, mainly to be able to break some
ST> things while developing without having to worry about other people using the
ST> current system).
I use svn-buildpackage too. Quite good. We shall really go for it. I
usually inject my packages with:
svn-inject package_0.1-1.dsc svn://server/repo
which automatically creates the trunk and tags directory in the
repository following the schema:
/repo/package/trunk
/repo/package/tags
I don't know exactly how we could migrate the existent structure
though..
Cheers,
Free
Reply to: