Re: Any project prepared to submit packaging stuff to SVN before Florence conference
--- Begin Message ---
|--==> "AT" == Andreas Tille <email@example.com> writes:
AT> On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>>Actually I didn't feel to send any patch, as I think the approach to
>>meta-packages has to be re-thought a little bit, and my modifications
>>are quick and dirty hacks waiting for a better framework.
AT> OK. The reason why I was asking is that I'm preparing a talk for
AT> the "internal developer circle" which comes after the workshop for
AT> the public. SO if you have any ideas which I could include it would
AT> be great. It would not make any sense if I would present things many
AT> people do not really agree. What do you think are the most weak
AT> parts of the meta package approach?
Well, I'm going to talk about the during the workshop. Anywho
my main complain is that the approach is not scalable and hard wired
dependences are easy to break. First we need a package classification
system (as debtags), possibly supporting hierarchical categories (debtags
does), then such information can be used to perform a number of operation
on a given set of packages (i.e. a task or even sub-task):
2) menu tree generation
3) web based views (including sanity checks as found in qa.debian.org)
and everything you can think about.
Of course you find ways to all such things with meta-packages as well,
after all the information is the same, but IMO it's awkward and
More on this during the workshop!
--- End Message ---