On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 11:23, Andreas Tille wrote: > Well, it is newer but why should it not be? I see no problem in principle > why a directory with a newer time stamp should be a problem. It was > created via > > svn --force move <old-location> <new-location> > > which was absolutely no problem in a similar case. (The --force option > was necessary because svn asked for it.) > > In worst case I do a new checkput but I just want to know "the right > way" to go. I think the right way to go is to update and then commit. Please see in the svn book file:///usr/share/doc/subversion/book/book.html#svn-ap-a-sect-2 the section entitled "Directory Versions". Ben
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part