Re: debian-med override disparity
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Debian Installer wrote:
> There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
> override file for the following file(s):
>
> med-bio_0.8.1_all.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional.
> med-common_0.8.1_all.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional.
> med-dent_0.8.1_all.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional.
> med-imaging-dev_0.8.1_all.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional.
> med-imaging_0.8.1_all.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional.
> med-tools_0.8.1_all.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional.
>
> Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
> the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
> so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the
> override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why.
The change of the priority from optional to extra is intended and
was even done in former versions because meta packages can be depend
from packages with priority extra and to have consistency all meta packages
should have priority extra. There is a common sense about this between
all Custom Debian Distributions.
Kind regards
Andreas.
Reply to: