Re: AGPLv3+ exception ("Additional Permission")
Fabian Greffrath writes ("Re: AGPLv3+ exception ("Additional Permission")"):
> Am Dienstag, den 27.10.2015, 14:18 +0000 schrieb Ian Jackson:
> > I'm the author of an AGPLv3+ perl module to which I'm considering
> > applying a licence exception (an `Additional Permission').
> why do you post this to -curiosa instead of -legal then?
This module is not in Debian and probably not going to be any time
soon (for software engineering and effort reasons).
I'm sorry if you feel that I used the wrong list. I imagined I would
be told off in -legal for asking a non-Debian-related question.