Re: [MeeGo-dev] Packaging the MeeGo stack on Debian - Use the name?
- To: Robinson Tryon <bishop.robinson@gmail.com>
- Cc: debian-curiosa@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] Packaging the MeeGo stack on Debian - Use the name?
- From: Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:36:13 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20101210163613.GA28098@gwolf.org>
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTimLOJ3HKt1d=334ydDbUNTRZc=+EnnRY8TDNuGL@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <201010201651.22475.didier@raboud.com> <AANLkTinu6fhHTPAtBu+7rKZjee-PRME3ggnm12XncFnz@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimLOJ3HKt1d=334ydDbUNTRZc=+EnnRY8TDNuGL@mail.gmail.com>
Robinson Tryon dijo [Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 07:18:43AM -0500]:
> (...)
> It would actually be rather slick if projects just used their names
> frontwise-round as a trademarked term, and allowed the community to
> use their names in reverse to merely indicate heritage ("meego" ->
> "ogeem", "debian" -> "naibed", etc...). This would provide a
> standardized method for pointing at the upstream project without
> stepping on any Trademark toes.
>
> (Pronunciation is left as an exercise for the reader)
Hmmm, I wonder whether Xoferif (by the Noitadnuof Allizom) is
pronounceable enough.
> (Palindromicly-named projects (e.g. "PHP") pose a particular problem)
Well, we can always say that our PHP is spelt backwards. Or we can
call it qhq.
Reply to: