Re: ssh.upload.debian.org
- To: debian-curiosa@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: ssh.upload.debian.org
- From: "s. keeling" <keeling@nucleus.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 05:26:20 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <[🔎] slrnge5res.5b9.keeling@phreaque.nucleus.com>
- References: <87skrtk0i9.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de> <20080929045151.GC478@dario.dodds.net> <87zllrjxw8.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de> <1222669216.1378.44.camel@localhost> <87fxnjgyf5.fsf@delenn.ganneff.de> <20080930081744.GB14285@paranoidfreak.co.uk> <20080930084113.GA30182@usha.takhisis.invalid> <20080930091143.GW15136@anguilla.noreply.org> <48e1f21c.P9zVBQQmcBjJBxvA%mjr@phonecoop.coop> <20080930093855.GB15136@anguilla.noreply.org>
Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org>:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
>
> > Posting a simple mail like "I can't predict why we might want to move
> > it, but it seems like a possibility we should leave open and yes,
> > ftp-master was a symbolic name, but isn't the best one now. Please use
> > the new symbolic names." a few messages back might have stopped this.
>
> It also isn't accurate. The name was changed for the very reason that
> upload place should be uncoupled from archive maint place, for the few
> times where ries does go down. It was proposed when this happened last
> time, a few weeks back.
>
> Just because *you* don't get it doesn't mean it's stupid.
Reading this, it looks like a classic "Debian gotcha", as in, "Oh!
You didn't know we were going that way? Read Changelog!" Except this
one bites DDs instead of users. Welcome to the party.
I wonder if one of these days /etc is going to be bound up in a
reiserfs based registry.
Just kidding, sorta.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292
- - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me.
Reply to: