Re: Constitutional amendment: reduce the length of DPL election process
- To: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
- Cc: debian-curiosa@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Constitutional amendment: reduce the length of DPL election process
- From: Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 20:20:33 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 46B76671.6010105@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <20070806180041.GC3342@xanadu.blop.info>
- References: <20070731074806.GB4634@azure.humbug.org.au> <20070731171422.GO21569@volo.donarmstrong.com> <46b6fd8a.e1VCnIIfHLMNtBlZ%mjr@phonecoop.coop> <20070806180041.GC3342@xanadu.blop.info>
Hi,
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I see a conflict between:
> 2. The election begins nine weeks before the leadership post
> becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately.
> and:
> 8. The Project Leader serves for one year from their election.
> Could you please clarify when the new elected DD effectively becomes the
> DPL ?
I see a much stronger conflict. As soon as we have elected a new DPL,
the post no longer becomes vacant at the end of the term of the
incumbent, thus creating a nasty paradoxon.
Simon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Reply to: