Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent

[Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>]

On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are *way* better MTAs [than qmail] out
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > there that dont need tons of patches applied
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > just to fulfill basic requirements for a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > MTA.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > No, there are not.
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, there are.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > No, there are not.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Yes, there are.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > No, there are not.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Yes, there are.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No, there are not.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Yes, there are.
> > > > > 
> > > > > No, there are not.
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, there are.
> > > > 
> > > No, there are not.
> > 
> > Yes, there are.
>
> No, there are not.

Yes, there are.

Next? ;-)


Don Armstrong

-- 
My spelling ability, or rather the lack thereof, is one of the wonders
of the modern world.

http://www.donarmstrong.com              http://rzlab.ucr.edu