Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform

To: <moth.debian@gmail.com>, <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>, <debian-curiosa@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:19:41 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] E1D9SG5-0002bl-00@pipe.localnet>
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:44:45 -0500 <[🔎] d0461dbe050310094491739f9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E1D7GJL-00058b-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <4229a419$0$10950$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com> <878y52vy58.fsf@becket.becket.net> <422a55ef$0$10940$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com> <87mzthzh0e.fsf@becket.becket.net> <20050309165548.GM6283@piper.madduck.net> <20050309200751.GB24243@aenima> <422f8c52$0$10947$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com> <20050309200914.E32136@links.magenta.com> <422fb2c0$0$10938$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com> <[🔎] d0461dbe050310094491739f9@mail.gmail.com>

Raul Miller,

> However, I've changed the target for this message because I believe
> that you are not proposing any such thing.  As near as I can tell, you
> are not interested in fairness in the context of debian as a whole.

I feel it's obvious from my contributions to the DPL debates that
I am concerned about wider fairness issues in debian. I'm not going
to discuss them under a heading of "funny stuff regarding Debian".
I'd find your classification funny if it wasn't so sad.

-- 
MJR/slef

Reply to:

References:
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
  - From: Raul Miller <moth.debian@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
Next by Date: Re: depends
Previous by thread: Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
Next by thread: What's with your logo?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread