Re: good vs evil

To: Richard Smedley <richard.smedley@livepublishing.co.uk>
Cc: debian-curiosa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: good vs evil
From: "Justin F. Knotzke" <jknotzke@shampoo.ca>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:01:30 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030820130130.GH1269@shampoo.ca>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1061371370.622.2.camel@LUD.livepublishing.co.uk>
References: <[🔎] 1061371370.622.2.camel@LUD.livepublishing.co.uk>

<quote who=Richard Smedley date=[030820 05:31]/>
> ``Enter a URL, and the Gematriculator 
> (http://homokaasu.org/gematriculator/) will determine 
> the percentages of good and evil.  ''
> 
> Well www.debian.org gets a result of 50% Good, 50% evil
> With a balance like that, no wonder it's such a stable
> system :-)

    I think there is something wrong with the algorithm:

    http://www.sco.com is
      32% evil, 68% good

    Yah, right.

    J.

-- 
Justin F. Knotzke
jknotzke@shampoo.ca
http://www.shampoo.ca

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: good vs evil
  - From: "Martin G.H. Minkler" <dukeofnukem@gmx.net>
- Re: good vs evil
  - From: Frank Gevaerts <frank@gevaerts.be>
- Re: good vs evil
  - From: Elie De Brauwer <elie@de-brauwer.be>

References:
- good vs evil
  - From: Richard Smedley <richard.smedley@livepublishing.co.uk>

Prev by Date: good vs evil
Next by Date: Re: good vs evil
Previous by thread: good vs evil
Next by thread: Re: good vs evil
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread