Re: gcc-3.2 transition breaks build of KDE packages
On Thursday 09 January 2003 13:33, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 13:03:26 +0100
> > I know that in a transition some packages will stop building. The KDE
> > case is a little bit special, KDE 2.2 will not be rebuilt, and KDE 3
> > will normally be uploaded. However we hear that KDE 3 will entered
> > Sid since nearly one year, so I can't believe it will happen one
> > day...
> They always said they were waiting for the gcc-3.2 transition, which is
> what they've been doing... Now the transition is happening, I think KDE
> 3 will sid soon. See:
Hey, that's a really nice verb you created there. Maybe we should standardize
on this scheme, thereby getting rid of all those "progagate into/ end up in/
be in/ move to/ etc. a distribution" phrases. Just: "package xy will sarge
soon" would be enough for instance. This could also contribute to our elite
status, represented by sentences like: "I've did a lintian-clean NMU to
DELAYED/1-day, so it should testing soon"...
Sorry, simply couldn't resist ;-)
PS: just saw this rather funny sub-thread on kfm-devel:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:29:09AM -0800, David Joham wrote:
>>>Can anyone recommend a C++ GUI library for Win32, one that supports
>>You could always use the mozilla engine and draw your lightweight controls
>>with gecko and XUL...
> or use a vmware mdk with wine in it running the
> win32 bochs gui with linux running inside that,
> then you can just use gtkmm.
> that would be much simpler and would have less
> overhead than using mozilla of course.
Sounds like a great idea. I'll just go dust of my old Mac and install Virtual
PC so I can run Windows 2000 to run VMWare ....
Yven Johannes Leist - firstname.lastname@example.org