On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:20:17PM +0100, KELEMEN Peter said: > > test run on 200 previously unseen messages. 63% success rate, far > too low, and the databases exceeded 10M. SpamAssassin had 99.5% > percent success rate, but it is ridiculously slow compared to > Bayesian filters. Sounds to me like you should be passing it through Bogofilter first, and then through SpamAssassin. 63% of your spam would then no longer be going through the slower process. -- Shawn McMahon | Now is the time we should be celebrating AIM work: spmcmahonfedex | the Constitution and the rule of law, AIM home: smcmahoneiv | not abandoning it. - Neal Boortz
Attachment:
pgpkw5vdu7AgD.pgp
Description: PGP signature