[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFD: Reviving Constitutional amendment: Smith/Condorcet vote tallying



On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 16:27, Manoj Srivastava wrote:

>  Suppose for a moment that the automobile industry had developed at
>  the same rate as computers and over the same period:

There would be one brand of car control system that would have
approximately 90% of the market share. It would often simply stop
working --- or start working very erratically --- until one turned off
the car and turned it on again. Cars using this control system would
start out relatively responsive, but over the course of a few months,
start to require longer and longer to respond to commands until simple
things like steering became impossible. Eventually, the only solution
would be to carefully disassemble the car to remove the control system
--- which would be very heavily intertwined with every last bit of the
car, from the engine to the paint job --- and then promptly put it back.

The dominate control system would often unexpectedly give control to
another person, or to another car. Usually, part of the effect would be
to take control of other cars with that same control system. Cars taken
control of wouldn't even need be in the vicinity; often, it would be
done from halfway around the world. The control system in this
taken-over state will sometimes endeavor to kill the owner, or at least
menace him.

Cars with the dominate control system would include contracts --- which
you agree to by touching any part of the car --- to not in any way
observe the car to determine how it functions; to not in any way look at
the component pieces to hypothesize about their reason for existence; to
not modify the car in any way, including changing the color of the paint
job; to not produce replacement parts (and doing so would be illegal,
too) and to not allow anyone --- even family --- to borrow the car. Cars
would come with "Driver Rights Management" features which would allow
the car manufacturer to arbitrarily and without warning disable the car,
remotely. In addition, the production, use, and distribution of tools,
knowledge, and procedures that might allow people to circumvent any of
the above restrictions would be banned.

Occasionally, out of the blue, an advertisement would pop up over a
quarter of the windshield, right in front of the driver's face. The
driver would have to take his hands off the wheel, and carefully peel
off the advertisement in order to see well again. Also, at least a few
times per drive, the radio would just turn itself on --- or change the
station --- and set itself to maximum volume to play an obnoxious ad for
a questionably legal product. The frequency of these would increase
exponentially; pretty soon, the radio would just stay on, always with
those ads. Soon after than, there would be multiple ones playing on top
of each other.

Most people would consider the above paragraphs normal, and even
necessary to prevent the economy from collapsing. There would be many
other control systems, of which much if not all of the above three
paragraphs do not apply, but they'd all be considered either to hard to
use or to expensive.

[I could go on...]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: