Re: James Addison
> Even so: does this mean that we should be careful about disabling
> fcf-protection=branch on a broader/default basis?
The question was entirely only about bookworm. In bookworm, none of
the fcf-protection bits are enabled by default. It was solely active
in sudo because upstream enabled it.
I believe the question of disabling fcf-protection is not relevant for
any other bookworm package. The "unstable" part of that question
should be discussed on -devel, not in this bug.
Christoph
Acknowledged - thanks, Christoph.