Hi Andreas, While I think you're right that this is just some example text, and given that it was added in quite a large commit, touching many other files, all of which are presumably under GPL, with no mention of the intent to license that one file differently, it would be quite surprising if that was the way that's supposed to be interpreted. On the other hand, given that it's an example, perhaps the author wanted to make sure people could cheerfully cut&paste it into things that were not GPLed? I'd say the only way to be sure would be to ask the author(he seems pretty active on GitHub, so seems likely to respond in a timely manner). Cheers, Phil. -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd. |-| http://www.hands.com/ http://ftp.uk.debian.org/ |(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg, GERMANY
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature