On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 03:31:13PM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote: > ===Begin Resolution A > The Technical Committee overrides the util-linux maintainer, and requires > that util-linux's rename should be shipped as /usr/bin/rename.ul in a binary > package built from src:util-linux. The package containing rename.ul must not > conflict with the rename package nor divert /usr/bin/rename. > ===End Resolution A > > ===Begin Resolution B > The Technical Committee overrides the util-linux maintainer, and requires > that util-linux's rename should be shipped in a binary package built from > src:util-linux. If this package Conflicts with the rename package, then it > must not contain any other binaries. > ===End Resolution B > > ===Begin Resolution N > None of the above > ===End Resolution N Sorry for the delay. I vote: A > N > B -- Niko Tyni ntyni@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature