Hi,
* Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> [220125 00:06]:
On Mon 24 Jan 2022 at 11:33AM +01, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
For context, the idea is that /usr/bin/rename should become
src:util-linux' rename implementation.
That seems likely to break a great many scripts, though?
Perhaps we should ship them both under a name other than
/usr/bin/rename, such that people are prompted to update their scripts
to choose one, or create their own symlink?
Then all of this is a completely pointless exercise. Either we break
them, or it is favorable to keeping the way things are:
A very valid way of closing this discussion is saying "our
(Perl) /usr/bin/rename is great, people should use that".
Chris