Thank you very much for starting this vote, Sean. I vote A > B > F. > > === Resolution A === > > > > The Technical Committee resolves: > > > > 1. The debianutils package must continue to provide the which(1) program > > until a compatible utility is available in a package that is at least > > transitively essential in Debian 12. > > > > For the Debian 12 release, we expect which(1) to be in either an > > Essential package or a transitively Essential package (that is, a > > package that is depended on by an Essential package). > > > > 2. The which(1) program must not print any deprecation warnings. > > > > 3. We decline to overrule the maintainer of debianutils regarding the > > use of alternatives. If another package takes over responsibility > > for which(1), then the debianutils maintainers and the other > > package's maintainers should coordinate to choose a suitable > > mechanism, which might be either versioned Depends/Breaks/Replaces, > > dpkg-divert, alternatives or something else. > > > > 4. The debianutils package must continue to provide the tempfile(1) > > program until a compatible utility is available in a package that is > > at least transitively essential in Debian 12. > > > > For the Debian 12 release, we expect tempfile(1) to be in either an > > Essential package or a transitively Essential package. > > > > 5. Programs in debianutils must not be moved to /usr until we have a > > project-wide consensus on going ahead with such a move, and any > > programs that have already been moved must be moved back. In > > particular, this means debianutils must contain /bin/run-parts and > > /sbin/installkernel for the time being. > > > > === Resolution B === > > > > As Resolution A, except strike point (2) and renumber succeeding items. > > > > === End Resolutions === > > > > A: Issue Resolution A > > B: Issue Resolution B > > F: Further Discussion > > I vote: > > A > B > F --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature