Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages
> Here, the situation here is more complicated. There was a private
> communication with the committee, but such side conversations are
> unfair: How can Matthew ever feel that justice was served? I would
> personally not feel closure unless I saw all such communications and
> had an opportunity to respond.
>
> Secrecy, if it is really needed, should instead be implemented by
> requiring all parties involved to keep sealed records confidential.
>
> I urge the committee to please reconsider its willingness to engage
> with one party without the other present. The dignity of the Technical
> Committee—Debian's highest and most hallowed body—could suffer.
the ability to talk privately with the committee is something CTTE has
allowed for a long time; it's a two-sided coin: it can prevent heated
exchanges, but it can also leave a sour taste in the petitioner's
mouth.
While i would tend to agree that it's slightly unfair, i've never been
on the other side to judge it fully.
Regards,
--
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi
Reply to: