Didier 'OdyX' Raboud dijo [Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 02:58:09PM +0100]: > === Resolution === > > The Technical Committee resolves to decline to override the debootstrap > maintainers. > > Furthermore, using its §6.1.5 "Offering advice" power, the Technical > Committee considers that the desirable solution at the time of `bullseye` is: > > * W: `weak`: both directory schemes are allowed, but packages should only > be built on hosts with classical directory schemes (or in such > chroots) > > * M: `middle`: both directory schemes are allowed, and packages (including > official packages) can be built on hosts with either classical > or "merged `/usr`" directory schemes > > * H: `hard`: both directory schemes are allowed, but packages should only > be built on hosts with "merged `/usr`" directory schemes (or in > such chroots) > > * FD: Further Discussion > > === End Resolution === My vote is: H > M > FD > W
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature