Le mardi, 19 février 2019, 01.59:18 h CET Steve McIntyre a écrit :
> While I'm not necessarily disagreeing with the overall point(s) here,
> some of the points in this list of arguments seem dubious at
> best. Maybe you could expand?
Sure. Sorry for publishing a new ballot before answering.
> >* booting with `/` only is not systematically tested in Debian anymore;
>
> I'm assuming you mean "/ without /usr" here?
Yes. Clarified this point by merging it with the "separate / and /usr" one
above.
> >* the packaging infrastructure to install files outside of `/usr` is not
> > standard and represents technical debt:
>
> I have no idea what you're suggesting here.
Same here (clarified in the ballot). What I'm trying to say here is that
installing (e.g.) libs to /lib instead of /usr/lib is usually a deviation from
standard software building (either in upstream packaging, or in debian/rules),
that needs to be maintained on the long-term.
Cheers,
OdyXAttachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.