Bug#919951: ocaml builder must not be called `dune' or provide /usr/bin/dune
- To: 919951@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#919951: ocaml builder must not be called `dune' or provide /usr/bin/dune
- From: Ansgar <ansgar@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:25:53 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87pnrpsdta.fsf@43-1.org>
- Reply-to: Ansgar <ansgar@debian.org>, 919951@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <87va21ryf3.fsf__11948.7294157565$1549187843$gmane$org@marvin.43-1.org> (Ansgar's message of "Sun, 03 Feb 2019 10:53:04 +0100")
- References: <23620.62141.485971.675758@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <23620.62141.485971.675758@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <87va21ryf3.fsf__11948.7294157565$1549187843$gmane$org@marvin.43-1.org> <23620.62141.485971.675758@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Dear technical committee,
it would be nice if #919951 would be dealt with in time to allow
affected packages to migrate to testing before the freeze.
FWIW it looks like whitedune was now binNMUed, but dune is still blocked
by #919953.
Ansgar writes:
> I am tempted to suggest that this issue is dealt with by passing a
> resolution reminding the submitter of 6.3.6 of the constitution and
> suggesting a bit more constructive behavior in the future.
This still looks like a good resolution to me.
Ansgar
Reply to: