[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#914897: #914897: debootstrap, buster: Please disabled merged /usr by default



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi,

On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 19:40:45 +0100
"Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <odyx@debian.org> wrote:
> tl;dr: debootstrap maintainers; can you agree to disable "merged /usr" by 
> default now, or are you OK letting the TC decide on this subject?

 Hmm, I'm still considering what's the good way...

> Hideki, if I read the debootstrap history correctly, you enabled "merged /usr" 
> by default in debootstrap 1.0.102. 

 Yes, that's right. #839046 was filed in Sep 2016, and uploaded in Jun 2018.

> Given the recent discussion in debian-
> devel@ (starting at [0]) and on #914897, could you (or anyone speaking as with 
> a "debootstrap maintainer" hat on) state if, either of:
> 
> * you would be willing to toggle the "merged /usr" default in debootstrap in a
>   subsequent upload;
> * you maintain that the "merged /usr" default (to yes) is here to stay.

 Well, with a quick look to the thread (I cannot follow all of the email in it,
 tons of emails...), I cannot find the discussion about

  - What is the problem? (broken build for which packages? Just R?)
  - How many packages are affected?
  - Why it was caused? (just symlink to /bin or /sbin isn't enough
    to deal with it?)
  - Does it cause any failure on users' machine?

 So, I want to listen above things (not thought or idea), then reply to
 your question. Please quote if someone can do it.


- -- 
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane     henrich @ debian.org/iijmio-mail.jp
 http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=yD0D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: