Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive
- To: Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>
- Cc: 904302@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive
- From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no>
- Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 19:48:27 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87wor0jl3o.fsf@err.no>
- Reply-to: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no>, 904302@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <871s9pek5g.fsf@hands.com> (Philip Hands's message of "Wed, 19 Sep 2018 14:39:23 +0200")
- References: <87o9eyeofq.fsf@silentflame.com> <87o9eyeofq.fsf@silentflame.com> <877ekztkew.fsf@err.no> <87o9eyeofq.fsf@silentflame.com> <87sh2aelmf.fsf@err.no> <87o9eyeofq.fsf@silentflame.com> <87mushdxgz.fsf@hands.com> <87o9eyeofq.fsf@silentflame.com> <87efdqo9j6.fsf@err.no> <87o9eyeofq.fsf@silentflame.com> <871s9pek5g.fsf@hands.com> <87o9eyeofq.fsf@silentflame.com>
]] Philip Hands
> On reflection this seems like we're straying into micro-management.
> Should we really be determining the detail of how this is done in
> policy?
Given the entire decision has been delegated to us, I think we should,
yes. If we'd just been asked to decide on a matter of technical policy,
that would have been slightly different.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
Reply to: