[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#862051: nodejs (6.11.2~dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=medium



Jérémy Lal <kapouer@melix.org> writes:

> 2017-08-30 11:50 GMT+02:00 Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>:
>
>> Jérémy Lal <kapouer@melix.org> writes:
>>
>> > 2017-08-29 21:39 GMT+02:00 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <odyx@debian.org>:
>> >
>> >> Le mardi, 29 août 2017, 17.46:22 h CEST Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
>> >> > Leave /usr/bin/nodejs there for at least one more release.
>> >>
>> >> I'll just note for the purpose of the TC discussion that as of nodejs
>> >> 6.11.2~dfsg-3 (the version currently in unstable) , the /usr/bin/nodejs
>> →
>> >> node
>> >> symlink still exists, so at this point, I don't consider there is
>> material
>> >> for
>> >> a TC decision either way, but it's an important conversation to be had.
>> >>
>> >> Jérémy: could you maybe clarify your plan and your rationale? This would
>> >> help
>> >> putting everyone on common grounds.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I replaced /usr/bin/nodejs by /usr/bin/node, and made a symlink from
>> > /usr/bin/nodejs to /usr/bin/node.
>> > My plan was to simply keep /usr/bin/nodejs around for some time until
>> > no debian package rely on it. The JavaScript debian team wiki is updated
>> > to reflect that.
>>
>> I was against the TC instructing you how to behave in detail in our
>> resolution, because I couldn't imagine that anyone would think that
>> tidiness was more important than not breaking things for our users.
>>
>> Are you really going to prove me wrong?
>>
>> How much is it costing you to keep the symlink there?
>>
>> Do you expect that cost to ever exceed the effort of responding to even
>> the first bug reported about this, when you turn out to have broken
>> someone's locally-written script?
>>
>> Actually, do you expect it to ever exceed the effort already wasted in
>> responding to this thread by you and us?
>>
>> It's pretty clear that if you do decide to go ahead and remove
>> /usr/bin/nodejs quickly, that someone is likely to kick the matter back
>> up to the TC.
>>
>> I for one will have absolutely no sympathy with your side of the case at
>> that point, not only because I think it is senseless, but also because
>> you'll have been responsible for wasting the time of all involved.
>>
>> I will also not be even slightly timid about micro-managing you the
>> second time around, since if that comes to pass you'll have demonstrated
>> the need.
>
>
> Maybe i didn't express myself properly: the idea is to keep /usr/bin/nodejs
> until it's no longer needed - be it other debian packages or other user
> scripts.
> If it was to be really removed, it shouldn't be done without some
> deprecation
> warning and time for users to notice and change their code.

Ah, well -- that's all fine then.  Thanks for clarifying.

Cheers, Phil.
-- 
|)|  Philip Hands  [+44 (0)20 8530 9560]  HANDS.COM Ltd.
|-|  http://www.hands.com/    http://ftp.uk.debian.org/
|(|  Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34,   21075 Hamburg,    GERMANY

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: