Bug#846002: blends-tasks must not be priority:important - ballot proposal
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 07:25:32PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Is our intent to override the maintainer or provide advice?
> I don't care what the answer is but perhaps we want to be clear.
> I'm fine with this ballot beyond that.
> Perhaps we want to override the blends-tasks maintainers to the extent
> that they disagree with the tasksel maintainers?
Past Christmas I was quite occupied by real life (and my sweet family
;-) members) but just a short note: I think the Blends team is really
happy if a Blends selection will happen at the tasksel step - no matter
how it is finally implemented.
Kind regards and happy new year