Bug#846002: blends-tasks must not be priority:important (was Re: Bug#846002: Lowering severity)
Hi Steve,
On 20.12.2016 15:16, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I *have* also seen users confused by the addition of the blends
Can you be more specific here? Old wording (with many blends) or current
solution? What was the specific problem?
> into the tasksel list. A better split of the tasks (like Phil is
> suggesting) would help a lot here.
This is for sure. Cyril just states that he rather would love to remove
the blends completely, and this is something I am arguing against.
That Phils solution is a great compromise, is out of question. IMO it
would help much if d-i would help here a bit instead of just trying to
play a veto game.
Best regards
Ole
Reply to: