Am 10.12.2016 um 14:15 schrieb Ole Streicher: > Hi Michael, > > On 10.12.2016 13:18, Michael Biebl wrote: >> While I have no opninion on whether blend-tasks is important enough to >> have installed by default, I would urge to revisit the idea to (mis)use >> the package priority to achieve that. > > That is the standard way how tasksel gets its menu: tasksel-data is > marked as "important" and that way it finds its way onto the installer > image. So, all arguments you have here are also valid for the default > tasks. If we think this is wrong, we should get a completely different > solution here -- which is IMO outside of the scope of this bug. Well, two wrongs don't make one right. An obvious solution seemed to me, to make tasksel(-*) depend on blends-tasks. This why, the package would be marked as auto-installed, and should you later decide to implement that differently, say directly in tasksel, then tasksel can simply drop that dependency. I assume though you have considered this obvious solution and decided against it for some reason? Regards, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature