Hi, Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> (2016-12-20): > As I already wrote several times: before you do so, please show some > evidence that in the half year that the current version of the installer > containing a blends selection has added an unacceptable amount of > confusion and that we can't solve that by changing the wording or such. Having more choices means more confusion. Look at any UX studies, or install parties. Also, choices aren't consistent depending on installation media, which doesn't help. You might call it me being weird, but this is how we've tried to balance choices in D-I for a few years (10+ AFAICT), as already confirmed by Christian earlier. The addition of various blends in the path of all users shifts this balance, in the wrong direction. > We already have more that 5700 popcon-counted installations with the > blends selection in the installer. This should give some base for > that. Surely, people asking for blends are using blends selection. That's nice and I'm pretty sure nobody is going to dispute that. But that shouldn't make d-i more confusing for others. KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature