❦ 8 décembre 2016 23:32 +1030, Ron <ron@debian.org> : > One is whatever it is that the third-party ggtags wrapper needs, which > aiui is what Vincent and Punit are most annoyed about. But I don't > use emacs, and ggtags isn't even in Debian - and they haven't even > told me what error they see, let alone what operation(s) trigger it. > > Vincent just gave me the output of global's short --help, and said > "look, there's new options" - but we don't even know if it's actually > a 'missing' command line option that it fails on (or which one that > might be), or something else entirely. My hunch is that one would > probably be pretty trivial to fix - either in ggtags or global, or > both - if someone who uses it engages with what I asked originally, > to file a separate bug from the 'new upstream' one, detailing the > actual problem, and is willing to test any proposed fixes even if > they aren't up to actually submitting a patch for that themselves. > I don't mind writing a patch if we know what actually needs patching. Or, more likely, just like for #587489, #613011, #182188, #212040, #218111, #669617, #756367 and #130091 (more than half of the open bugs for global), you will just ignore the bug report. I have not included #715980 and #716006 which are automated. I don't understand how you can try to paint yourself as someone who cares about your users while there is this public track record of your unwilligness to discuss with anybody. And for this particular case, you didn't asked for anything more. You just said nothing. -- The surest protection against temptation is cowardice. -- Mark Twain
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature