Bug#841294: Overrule maintainer of "global" to package a new upstream version
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#841294: Overrule maintainer of "global" to package a new upstream version"):
> These are the only two references I could find in the whole of this
> bug (#841294) from you to your own earlier messages. In fact #574947
> contains only FIVE responses from you over a period of SIX YEARS.
> #816924, filed in March 2016, contains none.
I made this timeline to show how Ron thinks it is appropriate to deal
with this package.
Messages to #574947 and #816924, combined
Each # is one email
Each P is one email containing a patch or link to updated package
Each U is one upload
Users and Maintainer Notes
contributors activity
# Mar 2010 Request for 5.9.3
Apr 2010
May 2010
Jun 2010
Jul 2010
Aug 2010
# Sep 2010
Oct 2010 U Last-ever maintainer upload
Nov 2010 [ last new-upstream-version
P Dec 2010 upload was in 2008. ]
Jan 2010
Feb 2010
# Mar 2011
Apr 2011
May 2011
# Jun 2011 User reports success
Jul 2011 with Dec patch for 5.9.x
Aug 2011
Sep 2011
Oct 2011
Nov 2011
Dec 2011
Jan 2012
Feb 2012
Mar 2012
Apr 2012
May 2012
Jun 2012
# Jul 2012
Aug 2012
Sep 2012
Oct 2012
Nov 2012
Dec 2013
Jan 2013
P# Feb 2013
# Mar 2013
## Apr 2013 #
## May 2013 #
Jun 2013
Jul 2013
Aug 2013
Sep 2013
Oct 2013
# Nov 2013
Dec 2013
# Jan 2014
Feb 2014
# Mar 2014
#########P Apr 2014 ##
May 2014
#### Jun 2014 #
Jul 2014
Aug 2014
Sep 2014
Oct 2014
Nov 2014
Dec 2014
Jan 2015
Feb 2015
# Mar 2015
Apr 2015
May 2015
# Jun 2015
Jul 2015
Aug 2015
Sep 2015
Oct 2015
Nov 2015
Dec 2015
Jan 2016
Feb 2016
### Mar 2016
# Apr 2016
May 2016
Jun 2016
Jul 2016
Aug 2016
Sep 2016
####### Oct 2016
------- tc referral ------
--
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
Reply to: