❦ 20 octobre 2016 10:08 +0200, Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> : >>>> Please describe the relevant differences between browserified javascript >>>> and perl that make the TC believe that the former has a DFSG issue but >>>> the latter probably has not, in a way that I can deduct what the TC >>>> would believe regarding the similiar problem related to SQLite. >>> >>> Configure in Perl is a build tool, and appears amenable to manual >>> patching. >>> >>> Browserified Javascript is hardly human-editable, and it is shipped as >>> part of built packages. >> >> I don't think this is the debate. The debate is around pre-minified >> versions. Those versions are also human-editable and amenable to manual >> patching. > > I dispute that there was anything like a useful debate, because all > attempts to discover what "browserified" is supposed to mean have been > ignored. Despite that, this is still the term that continues to be used > to pose the question. What "browserified" means may still be debatable, but nobody is pretending that minified JS without source is suitable for main. The usage to put non-minified JS in debian/missing-sources is quite widespread. -- A is for Apple. -- Hester Pryne
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature