[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#835507: Please clarify that sysvinit support decision is not going to expire



>>>>> "Ian" == Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:

    Ian> Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Bug#835507: Please clarify that
    Ian> sysvinit support decision is not going to expire"):
    >> Ian, quick question for you because you might know the answer off
    >> the top of your head.  Does running stretch with sysvinit as your
    >> init system work reasonably well, or at least work well enough
    >> that there are a small number of bugs we will likely be able to
    >> fix in the stretch time frame?  What I say below is predicated on
    >> the assumption that init scripts are basically functional for
    >> stretch.  If that's not true I'd need to rethink my position.

    Ian> I am running stretch with sysvinit on my laptop.  It seems to
    Ian> work for me.  I haven't conducted any kind of systematic
    Ian> survey.

That's the rough estimate I thought you could provide easily and was
looking for.

That's good enough that I definitely support reaffirming policy 9.3.2
and 9.3.3.


Reply to: