Re: Bug#750135: Status of #750135 (Maintainer of aptitude package)
>>>>> "Tollef" == Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> writes:
Tollef> ]] Sam Hartman
>> A major advantage of this approach is that it can happen from
>> within the aptitude project. Christian has the technical
>> authority to implement this. He's asked for review of the social
>> authority, but we could support this way of the aptitude project
>> reorganizing itself without needing to override a maintainer or
>> exclude daniel from making technical contributions if he
>> reappears.
Tollef> Nothing in my proposal would exclude Daniel from making
Tollef> technical contributions though.
Understood.
Tollef> I'm happy enough to accept your suggested solution too, the
Tollef> practical end result is pretty much the same. The message
Tollef> we send might not be the entirely the same, but I'd rather
Tollef> get it unblocked than have «my» solution be preferred.
Unless we get significantly more feedback very soon, let's stick both on
the ballot. I'm happy to have two reasonable options here. I think
you've given a reasonable period for people to comment on the approach.
Do you need help drafting ballot text?
I think we'll want to have another round of comments before calling for
a vote.
Reply to: