On Thursday 10 April 2014 09:38:28 Bdale Garbee wrote: > Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes: > > I did find three which are arguably recalcitrant maintainers: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=407750 > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609807 > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=738027 > > > > But this is a gratifyingly low level of obstruction. > > Yep. > > And, actually, it appears that only one of those, 609807, included > something like a patch... and that one just hasn't been responded to. And that has a reason: <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint=debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org;dist=unstable> Now if I add to that the reasons Sune posted in [0], I really won't bother in taking a look at it. Don't get me wrong, adding a patch will certainly wouldn't be a problem if there wasn't such a big queue of more important stuff to fix. [0] <https://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2014/04/msg00031.html> -- A child of five could understand this. Fetch me a child of five. -- Groucho Marx Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.