[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#746578: libpam-systemd to flip dependencies - proposal

Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> writes:

> This result concerns me greatly, and I think the technical committee
> should take this into account when considering whether to flip the
> dependencies of libpam-systemd around.

So, this came up before, and I believe that systemd-shim is not supposed
to interfere with systemd with the current version.  In other words, I
think the existence of the package on the system should be a no-op if the
system is booted with systemd.

That makes this a minor bug, but not something that's too serious.

Am I wrong about this?

Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Reply to: