Bug#746578: libpam-systemd to flip dependencies - proposal
Josh Triplett <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> This result concerns me greatly, and I think the technical committee
> should take this into account when considering whether to flip the
> dependencies of libpam-systemd around.
So, this came up before, and I believe that systemd-shim is not supposed
to interfere with systemd with the current version. In other words, I
think the existence of the package on the system should be a no-op if the
system is booted with systemd.
That makes this a minor bug, but not something that's too serious.
Am I wrong about this?
Russ Allbery (email@example.com) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>