Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution

To: 717076@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 17:32:52 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20140627163252.GA31824@riva.ucam.org>
Reply-to: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>, 717076@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 21420.27583.955977.281127@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
References: <20140320173701.GA8559@riva.ucam.org> <1401200779.26500.122012645.111B037F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <[🔎] 21419.20377.680306.758308@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 21420.27583.955977.281127@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 07:51:43PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>   A  libjpeg-turbo to become default libjpeg implementaton (1:1)
>   B  libjpeg8/9 to remain default libjpeg implementaton (1:1)
>   FD

I vote A FD B.

-- 
Colin Watson                                       [cjwatson@debian.org]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Bug#636783: minimum discussion period
Next by Date: Bug#636783: minimum discussion period
Previous by thread: Bug#717076: libjpeg draft resolution
Next by thread: Bug#681419: Alternative dependencies on non-free packages in main: counterargument
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread