Re: Bug#727708: How much of L vs T is still relevant in light of the Ubuntu announcement?

To: James Hogarth <james.hogarth@gmail.com>, 727708@bugs.debian.org, debian-ctte@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#727708: How much of L vs T is still relevant in light of the Ubuntu announcement?
From: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:28:03 -0700
Message-id: <87zjlth7m4.fsf@rover.gag.com>
In-reply-to: <1392393513.3021.3.camel@hoglap-co-tradefair.purley.hogarthuk.local>
References: <1392393513.3021.3.camel@hoglap-co-tradefair.purley.hogarthuk.local>

James Hogarth <james.hogarth@gmail.com> writes:

> So in light of the new announcement[1] how much of L vs T is still
> relevant?

Mark's announcement may mean that upstart is less likely to be a viable
alternative over time, but it says nothing at all about the other init
systems and their users in Debian.  

Bdale

Attachment: pgptBtoGhpWde.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#727708: How much of L vs T is still relevant in light of the Ubuntu announcement?
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>

References:
- Bug#727708: How much of L vs T is still relevant in light of the Ubuntu announcement?
  - From: James Hogarth <james.hogarth@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#727708: init system coupling etc.
Next by Date: Bug#727708: init system coupling etc.
Previous by thread: Bug#727708: How much of L vs T is still relevant in light of the Ubuntu announcement?
Next by thread: Bug#727708: How much of L vs T is still relevant in light of the Ubuntu announcement?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread