[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#727708: multiple init systems - formal resolution proposal

Steve Langasek writes ("Bug#727708: multiple init systems - formal resolution proposal"):
> [stuff]

Thanks for that, which I mostly agree with.

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:13:25PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Thus, for me, all of the "T" variants in Ian's latest draft
> (<21226.41292.366504.997315@chiark.greenend.org.uk>) rank below FD.

In my mail following the irc meeting I formally proposed the options
you see listed in that message: {U,D,O,V}{T,F} and GR and FD.

Are you satisfied that the wordings I propose there properly capture
the essence of the disagreement ?  (You haven't said this explicitly,
but I get the impression that you think they do.)

If not then please say so right away.  If you have better ideas you
should probably formally propose amendment(s), since the current
situation is that we are in the discussion period and are likely to
start the vote on Monday.

If you _are_ satisfied that the options on the ballot sufficiently
capture the essence of the dispute, then saying so would be helpful as
it might allow us to start the vote sooner.


Reply to: