Bug#727708: TC resolution revised draft
Ian Jackson writes ("TC resolution revised draft"):
> I'm going to follow up in a moment with a formal action to propose
> a resolution, starting the constitutional discussion period.
I hereby formally propose what I have called UM (text below).
I also hereby formally propose DM as an amendment, but do not accept
it.
After I hear from other TC members on the merits of O vs OM and V vs
VM, I will propose but not accept one of each, unless someone else
gets there first.
I suggest that those TC members who prefer to leave out the comments
about supporting multiple init systems propose D and/or U.
That will leave us voting on (most likely):
D systemd default in jessie, say nothing about multiple inits
DM systemd default in jessie, support multiple inits
U systemd default in jessie, say nothing about multiple inits
UM systemd default in jessie, support multiple inits
O openrc default in jessie
V sysvinit default in jessie
GR project should decide via GR
FD further discussion
We should see what people say by email and at the meeting, but unless
people disagree I think it would be sensible to have a formal
discussion period of about a week.
That would have us starting the vote on the 6th of February. Is
everyone available to vote then ?
Thanks,
Ian.
== version D (systemD) ==
The default init system for Linux architectures in jessie should
be systemd.
== version U (Upstart) ==
The default init system for Linux architectures in jessie should
be upstart.
== version O (Openrc) ==
The default init system for Linux architectures in jessie should
be openrc
== version V (sysVinit) ==
The default init system for Linux architectures in jessie should
be sysvinit (no change).
== version GR (General Resolution) ==
The Technical Committee requests that the project decide the
default init system for jessie by means of General Resolution.
== optional rider M (Multiple init systems) ==
Debian intends to support multiple init systems, for the
foreseeable future, and so long as their respective communities
and code remain healthy.
Where feasible, software should interoperate with non-default
init systems; maintainers are encouraged to accept technically
sound patches to enable interoperation, even if it results in
degraded operation while running under the init system the patch
enables interoperation with.
== rider for all versions except GR ==
This decision is automatically vacated by any contrary General
Resolution which passes by a simple majority. In that case the
General Resolution takes effect and the whole of this TC resolution
is to be taken as withdrawn by the TC, just as if the TC had
explicitly withdrawn it by a subsequent TC resolution.
Reply to: