Re: Next CTTE Meeting is in 40 minutes (or so) [date -d 'Thu Aug 22 17:00:00 GMT 2013']
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Don Armstrong wrote:
> The next CTTE meeting is in 40 minutes on #debian-ctte on irc.debian.org
====================
#debian-ctte Meeting
====================
Meeting started by dondelelcaro at 16:59:15 UTC. The full logs are
available at
http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-ctte/2013/debian-ctte.2013-08-22-16.59.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Who is here? (dondelelcaro, 16:59:44)
* Next Meeting? (dondelelcaro, 17:02:15)
* AGREED: next meeting 26th of september, same time (dondelelcaro,
17:03:39)
* #717076 Decide between libjpeg-turbo and libjpeg8 et al.
(dondelelcaro, 17:03:46)
* ACTION: Diziet To draft resolution asking libjpeg-turbo to make a
transition plan (Diziet, 17:05:28)
* AGREED: proceeding with drafting resolution in the absence of input
as to why turbo should not be chosen (dondelelcaro, 17:07:30)
* #685795 New ctte member (dondelelcaro, 17:07:53)
* ACTION: bdale to forward the candidate list with a variation on
these comments with some supporting text to the rest of you in a
non-public way (dondelelcaro, 17:13:03)
* #636783 super-majority conflict; (dondelelcaro, 17:13:32)
* ACTION: bdale to comment on advisory overruling constitutional
amendment (dondelelcaro, 17:15:34)
* AGREED: wait on amendments to fix overruling advice, then proceed
(dondelelcaro, 17:23:05)
* #681419 Depends: foo | foo-nonfree (dondelelcaro, 17:23:15)
* ACTION: vorlon to write up response to Diziet about Depends: foo |
foo-nonfree (dondelelcaro, 17:24:00)
* Additional Business (dondelelcaro, 17:24:07)
* LINK: https://wiki.debian.org/Debate <-- this actually has the rules
for the debate (dondelelcaro, 17:39:35)
Meeting ended at 17:49:33 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* Diziet To draft resolution asking libjpeg-turbo to make a transition
plan
* bdale to forward the candidate list with a variation on these comments
with some supporting text to the rest of you in a non-public way
* bdale to comment on advisory overruling constitutional amendment
* vorlon to write up response to Diziet about Depends: foo | foo-nonfree
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* bdale
* bdale to forward the candidate list with a variation on these
comments with some supporting text to the rest of you in a
non-public way
* bdale to comment on advisory overruling constitutional amendment
* Diziet
* Diziet To draft resolution asking libjpeg-turbo to make a transition
plan
* vorlon to write up response to Diziet about Depends: foo |
foo-nonfree
* vorlon
* vorlon to write up response to Diziet about Depends: foo |
foo-nonfree
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* dondelelcaro (68)
* bdale (53)
* Diziet (42)
* vorlon (24)
* MeetBot (2)
* weasel (1)
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
Quite the contrary; they *love* collateral damage. If they can make
you miserable enough, maybe you'll stop using email entirely. Once
enough people do that, then there'll be no legitimate reason left for
anyone to run an SMTP server, and the spam problem will be solved.
-- Craig Dickson in <20020909231134.GA18917@linux700.localnet>
Reply to: